Upload the EB-1A, EB-2 NIW, or O-1A petition you prepared yourself, and CaseBuilder reviews it the way a USCIS adjudicator would. You get criterion-by-criterion verdicts, RFE-risk flags, the specific gaps, and concrete recommendations you can act on before you submit. It is an objective review of your draft. It does not rewrite your petition, it does not file for you, and no outcome is guaranteed.
$149 (regular $199). A one-time review of your self-prepared draft. You act on the report; USCIS decides every case independently.
When you self-prepare a petition, you lose the outside perspective that catches what an officer will question. Petition Review gives you that read. You upload the petition you drafted, and CaseBuilder evaluates it against the framework that actually governs your case: the Kazarian criteria for EB-1A, the Dhanasar prongs for EB-2 NIW, or the extraordinary-ability criteria for O-1A. It reports where your draft is strong, where it is thin, and where it is most likely to draw a Request for Evidence.
The output is a structured review report you act on yourself. It does not rewrite your petition, it does not build your filing package, it is not legal advice, and it does not predict or guarantee approval. What it does is show you, concretely and criterion by criterion, what an adjudicator is likely to see, so you can decide what to strengthen before you file.
See how the review works →A self-prepared petition often reads well to its author and still leaves an adjudicator unconvinced on a specific criterion. A weak comparison, an unsupported claim, or a criterion argued but not evidenced is exactly what triggers a Request for Evidence. Seeing those weak points before you file is far cheaper than answering them after.
Add the petition you prepared yourself (EB-1A, EB-2 NIW, or O-1A), or, if you are answering a Request for Evidence, upload the RFE notice plus the response you drafted. CaseBuilder reads every document with OCR.
CaseBuilder reads your draft the way a USCIS adjudicator would, evaluating it against the framework that governs your case: Kazarian criteria, Dhanasar prongs, or O-1A criteria for a petition, or issue by issue against the RFE for a response.
You get a structured report: verdicts, gaps, and RFE-risk areas with concrete recommendations. You decide what to strengthen. If the review finds gaps you would rather have addressed for you, the full CaseBuilder package can build or strengthen it. The review does not file for you.
USCIS does not grade your petition as one number, and neither does this review. It reads each governing criterion on its own terms, tells you where your draft clearly meets it, where the support is thin, and where a criterion is argued but not yet evidenced. That is what tells you, precisely, what to strengthen before you file.
Your draft evidences this criterion clearly with documents an officer can follow
Argued but thinly evidenced, a likely area for a Request for Evidence as drafted
Claimed in the petition but no supporting evidence found in your draft yet
Illustrative example. Your actual criteria, verdicts, and flagged gaps depend entirely on your own petition and the visa category you are filing under.
Petition Review covers two inputs. Review a petition you drafted, or review a response you drafted to a Request for Evidence. Both come back as a structured report you act on before you file.
You upload the EB-1A, EB-2 NIW, or O-1A petition you prepared yourself. The review reads it as an adjudicator would and returns criterion-by-criterion verdicts, the specific gaps, RFE-risk flags, and concrete recommendations to strengthen the draft before you file.
Already drafted a response to a Request for Evidence? You upload the RFE notice plus your drafted response, and the review judges your response issue by issue against the RFE: what is covered, what is weak, what is missing, and where a denial risk remains.
Want the response drafted from scratch rather than reviewed? That is a separate product. See RFE Response Drafting →
Petition Review reads and assesses your draft. It does not rewrite it, does not assemble your filing package, and does not submit anything to USCIS. The report is yours to act on. If you want the petition built or strengthened for you, that is the full CaseBuilder package, arranged separately.
CaseBuilder is document preparation software, not a law firm. Petition Review does not provide legal advice, does not create an attorney-client relationship, and is not a substitute for a licensed attorney. If you want a lawyer to review your petition, that is your decision and is arranged separately.
No tool can guarantee an outcome, and this review makes no such promise. It does not calculate approval odds or predict a decision. It surfaces strengths, gaps, and RFE-risk areas so you can act on them. USCIS decides every case independently.
Petition Review is for people who prepared their own petition, or their own RFE response, and want an objective pre-filing read before they commit. If you have done the work yourself and want to know where you actually stand, this is built for you.
Upload the petition or RFE response you drafted, and get a criterion-by-criterion review with gaps, RFE-risk flags, and recommendations. $149 (regular $199). You act on the report; USCIS decides every case independently.
Petition Review is a pre-filing review of a petition you have already drafted yourself. You upload your self-prepared EB-1A, EB-2 NIW, or O-1A petition, and CaseBuilder reads it the way a USCIS adjudicator would. It returns a structured review report: criterion-by-criterion verdicts, RFE-risk flags, specific gaps, and concrete recommendations you can act on before you file. It is a review of your draft, not a rewrite and not a filing.
No. Petition Review reads and assesses your draft; it does not rewrite your petition, does not build or assemble your filing package, and does not submit anything to USCIS. The output is a report you use to improve your own petition. If the review finds gaps you would rather have addressed for you, the full CaseBuilder package can build or strengthen the petition separately.
Yes. Petition Review has a second mode for people who have already drafted a response to a USCIS Request for Evidence. You upload the RFE notice plus your drafted response, and the review judges your response issue by issue against the RFE: what is covered, what is weak, what is missing, and where a denial risk remains. If you want the response drafted from scratch instead of reviewed, use the separate RFE Response Drafting product.
No. No software or attorney can guarantee an outcome, and USCIS decides every case independently. Petition Review does not predict or guarantee approval and does not calculate approval odds. It surfaces strengths, gaps, and RFE-risk areas in your draft so you can decide what to strengthen before filing. The decision always rests with USCIS.
No. CaseBuilder is document preparation software, not a law firm, and Petition Review does not provide legal advice, legal representation, or an attorney-client relationship. It is an automated review of a draft you prepared. If you want a licensed attorney to review your petition, that is your decision and is arranged separately.
You get a structured review report: an overall verdict, a criterion-by-criterion (or issue-by-issue, for an RFE response) assessment, your top strengths, the critical gaps, the areas most likely to draw an RFE, and concrete recommendations. The report is yours to act on. It does not change your petition for you; you decide what to do with it.
Petition Review is an objective read of a draft you already prepared, priced as a standalone review. The full CaseBuilder package goes further: it helps build and strengthen the petition itself. The separate RFE Response Drafting product drafts a response to a Request for Evidence from scratch. Petition Review, by contrast, reviews a petition you drafted or a response you drafted, and tells you where it stands before you file.